The Orange Mane -  a Denver Broncos Fan Community  

Go Back   The Orange Mane - a Denver Broncos Fan Community > Orange Mane Discussion > Orange Mane Central Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Chat Room Mark Forums Read



View Poll Results: Name the QB Mount Rushmore
John Elway 83 95.40%
Joe Montana 69 79.31%
Otto Graham 12 13.79%
Sammy Baugh 14 16.09%
Dan Marino 22 25.29%
Bart Starr 8 9.20%
Tom Brady 29 33.33%
Warren Moon 3 3.45%
Brett Favre 11 12.64%
Joe Namath 2 2.30%
Terry Bradshaw 5 5.75%
Peyton Manning 66 75.86%
Roger Staubach 4 4.60%
Steve Young 5 5.75%
Other 24 27.59%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 87. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-19-2012, 07:02 PM   #1
Mecklomaniac
Pro Bowler
 
Mecklomaniac's Avatar
 

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: WA
Posts: 681

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Jack Dolbin
Default QB Mount Rushmore

Ok, bye week boredom. After Monday nights comeback ESPN talked about if you had a Mount Rushmore for QBs who would it be. They had Peyton, Elway, Marino and Favre.

Radio station up here in Seattle picked it up and had a good discussion. They discussed a lot of different criteria (changed the game, championships, leadership, yards, etc..)

Sammy Baugh---- changed the way the game is played.
Otto Graham --- 10 consecutive championship games winning 7.
Warren Moon-- CFL and NFL hall of fame, lead the way for black QBs
Passing Yards--- Brett Favre
Leadership --- Elway taking teams with limited talent to the Superbowl
Comebacks --- Peyton Manning
Career pass completion % --- Chad Pennington


If you could only pick four who would you go with and why?
Mecklomaniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old 10-19-2012, 07:15 PM   #2
menonite
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Johnny Unitas?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 08:03 PM   #3
maher_tyler
Ring of Famer
 
maher_tyler's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 6,105

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Champ Bailey
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by menonite View Post
Johnny Unitas?
I knew that list didn't look right.

I voted Elway, Montana, Manning and Namath but would switch to Unitas.
maher_tyler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2012, 06:22 PM   #4
orinjkrush
...
 
orinjkrush's Avatar
 
Hey, no hurling on the shell, dude,

Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: FrontRangeAbove8500ft
Posts: 5,149

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Ben Garland
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by menonite View Post
Johnny Unitas?
yep

sammy baugh
unitas
staubach
montana
manning
orinjkrush is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 07:16 PM   #5
TheChamp24
Future HOF...CHAMP BAILEY
 
TheChamp24's Avatar
 
The Legend

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Broncos Country
Posts: 5,478
Default

Unitas changed the game a lot.

Unitas, Montana, Elway and Manning I think
TheChamp24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 07:21 PM   #6
menonite
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheChamp24 View Post
Manning
I would not want to be the dude in charge of chiseling out the forehead.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2012, 06:00 PM   #7
Seamus
Rust Contributor
 
Seamus's Avatar
 
Always something changing

Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: In the desert
Posts: 301
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by menonite View Post
I would not want to be the dude in charge of chiseling out the forehead.
Or the guy finding that much rock for it, I don't think they will let you chisel up Yosemite's half dome.
Seamus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 07:35 PM   #8
SouthStndJunkie
Ring of Famer
 
SouthStndJunkie's Avatar
 
Shannon Says: Listen to The Junkman

Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 16,080
Default

Yep....Johnny Unitas should have been on that list for sure and Joe Namath shouldn't be on the list.
SouthStndJunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 07:51 PM   #9
errand
Ring of Famer
 
errand's Avatar
 
Forgot more than you'll ever know

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Western NC mountains
Posts: 17,286
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthStndJunkie View Post
Yep....Johnny Unitas should have been on that list for sure and Joe Namath shouldn't be on the list.
Namath changed the game of how much money players earned.......and gave the AFL credibility winning SB III over heavily favored Colts....

He doesn't make my list of Baugh, Graham, Unitas, and Elway....but he was instrumental in changing the game some way.
errand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 07:57 PM   #10
SouthStndJunkie
Ring of Famer
 
SouthStndJunkie's Avatar
 
Shannon Says: Listen to The Junkman

Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 16,080
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by errand View Post
Namath changed the game of how much money players earned.......and gave the AFL credibility winning SB III over heavily favored Colts....

He doesn't make my list of Baugh, Graham, Unitas, and Elway....but he was instrumental in changing the game some way.
It's just my opinion, but anyone with a career 50.1% completion percentage and a 173 TD to 220 INT ratio shouldn't be in this list.

Namath's all time won/loss record is also under .500 at 62-63-4.

Maybe I would feel different had a I seen him play growing up and saw his impact in the game in that era.

You can't tell the history of the AFL/NFL without talking about him, but I don't think he should be in consideration for the Mount Rushmore of QBs.

Last edited by SouthStndJunkie; 10-19-2012 at 07:59 PM..
SouthStndJunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 08:07 PM   #11
errand
Ring of Famer
 
errand's Avatar
 
Forgot more than you'll ever know

Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Western NC mountains
Posts: 17,286
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SouthStndJunkie View Post
It's just my opinion, but anyone with a career 50.1% completion percentage and a 173 TD to 220 INT ratio shouldn't be in this list.

Namath's all time won/loss record is also under .500 at 62-63-4.

Maybe I would feel different had a I seen him play growing up and saw his impact in the game in that era.

You can't tell the history of the AFL/NFL without talking about him, but I don't think he should be in consideration for the Mount Rushmore of QBs.

again, depends on the criteria.....he gave the AFL credibility which led to the merger with NFL which created the new national past time and helped usher in higher salaries for the players.....

Sure his numbers weren't that great compared to the ones being put up by every QB today...but the leagues were alot different then than they are now....

to hit on half your passes was actually pretty good back in the day as DB's and LB's were allowed to knock your WR's down throughout the whole route practically, and linemen protecting you weren't allowed to use their hands when pass blocking, etc.....

Just one man's opinion...
errand is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 07:35 PM   #12
Carmelo15
Chauncey!
 
Carmelo15's Avatar
 
Jeyton Mannway

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 948

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Omar Bolden
Default

1. Joe Montana
2. John Elway
3. Peyton Manning
4. Dan Marino
Carmelo15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 08:10 PM   #13
BowlenBall
Hurry Hurry
 
BowlenBall's Avatar
 
2014 -- This one's for Pat.

Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Abu Dhabi
Posts: 5,230

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Matt Paradis
Default

Elway and Montana, no question.

Manning (but would like him to win one more super bowl to make it a slam dunk)

Very close for the last slot, but I suppose I'd give it to Unitas (Marion has no rings, therefore is not eligible)
BowlenBall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 08:21 PM   #14
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 36,508
Default

Elway- I am a Bronco fan
Unitas- first to really make the forward pass deadly
Marino- did anyone every throw the ball around better
Montana-ushered in the west coast high% passing game we still see today.
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2012, 08:51 PM   #15
ScottXray
Opinionated A******
 
ScottXray's Avatar
 
We will NOT lose!

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PDX (Portland OR)
Posts: 5,205

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Off. CENTER
Default

If only 4 I would have to go with
Elway ( carried three teams to bowls and then won 2 with complete teams)

Montana ( multiple championships, first to run the WCO)

Graham ( 10 consecutive championship games!)

Bradshaw ( eww... that almost made me throw up) ( 4 SB wins)
Brady might edge him out here. Basically a toss up. Someone Morph Brady and Bradshaws faces.

If Manning gets another 2 SB win then he probably replaces the last, because of his play elevating his teams.



Criteria...Multiple championships and appearances due to QB play!

On that basis Marino, Favre, Moon, Unitas et al don't make the mount. Currently also Peyton Manning.
ScottXray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2012, 01:16 AM   #16
extralife
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,929
Default

Unitas, Montana, Brady, Manning.

I wanted to drop Manning for Graham so you could have four QBs for four different generations, but right now I can't see this without both Manning and Brady. Elway and Graham would be five and six in some order.
extralife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2012, 01:22 AM   #17
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 36,508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by extralife View Post
Unitas, Montana, Brady, Manning.

I wanted to drop Manning for Graham so you could have four QBs for four different generations, but right now I can't see this without both Manning and Brady. Elway and Graham would be five and six in some order.
I disagree. Brady would never have survived the game back in Elways day. Back then dbacks could grab, they got 1 full step after you threw the ball to drive you into the dirt. You could hit defensless players and take them out of the game, which happened a lot. Broncos learned from the Raiders that whoozy players cant play football. Dennis Smith and Atwater took that out on WR for a decade. Meanwhile the Raiders would pummel Elway left and right, out of bounds, after the whistle, after he threw the ball, everytime he ran, and there was no sliding.

Manning and Brady are the best of the new era, but hard to compare or say they are better then Marino, Elway, Fouts, Kelly, those guys took a beating and kept on ticking.

The tackle that jim burt put on Montana to screw his back up would also be illegal now. Now pile driving the QB with your whole body weight.
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2012, 04:38 AM   #18
extralife
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 4,929
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cutthemdown View Post
I disagree. Brady would never have survived the game back in Elways day.
Brady is tough as ****. Maybe he misses a few more games, maybe he doesn't, you can't really say. The rules protect QBs much better these days, but don't forget that said protection was enacted and necessitated by the sheer athletic ability of defenders in today's game.

If you want to argue that Manning and Brady wouldn't have the same stats they do now if they had played in a different era, you won't find me disagreeing. But given that Manning is going to retire as number one or number two all time in every significant passing category and Brady won't be that far behind despite playing in a conservative offense for the first half of his career, well, a little statistical deflation wouldn't kill them. And winning is winning regardless of the era--in that department, Brady's five super bowl appearances are tied with you-know-who for the most all time. Brady has also succeeded in two entire different offensive systems, playing entirely different games. His winning percentage is the best in NFL history for a QB with anything near his games played (granted, Otto Graham has better numbers in this department, his just didn't come entirely in the NFL).

And if today's QBs would find it harder to play in a league that didn't protect them as much, yesterday's QBs would find it difficult to operate with the precision, responsibility, knowledge, and accuracy of Peyton Manning and his acolytes. Manning's command of the game is simply on a different level, he's the most distinctive QB to ever play the game. Watching Manning play the game is simply different from watching anyone else play the game. If I trust what I've read, the analog here is basically Unitas and no one else.
extralife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2012, 05:31 AM   #19
HorseHead
Ring of Famer
 
HorseHead's Avatar
 
Stay thirsty my friends..

Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,395

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Bay Bay
Default

By the end of his career, Brady will be right next to our boy on Rushmore..

Granted, a couple of those rings came courtesy of a clutch kicker, before the Moss air show, he didn't exactly have a stellar wr corps either...
HorseHead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2012, 02:16 PM   #20
cutthemdown
A verbis ad verbera
 
cutthemdown's Avatar
 
Zimm to HOF

Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 36,508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by extralife View Post
Brady is tough as ****. Maybe he misses a few more games, maybe he doesn't, you can't really say. The rules protect QBs much better these days, but don't forget that said protection was enacted and necessitated by the sheer athletic ability of defenders in today's game.

If you want to argue that Manning and Brady wouldn't have the same stats they do now if they had played in a different era, you won't find me disagreeing. But given that Manning is going to retire as number one or number two all time in every significant passing category and Brady won't be that far behind despite playing in a conservative offense for the first half of his career, well, a little statistical deflation wouldn't kill them. And winning is winning regardless of the era--in that department, Brady's five super bowl appearances are tied with you-know-who for the most all time. Brady has also succeeded in two entire different offensive systems, playing entirely different games. His winning percentage is the best in NFL history for a QB with anything near his games played (granted, Otto Graham has better numbers in this department, his just didn't come entirely in the NFL).

And if today's QBs would find it harder to play in a league that didn't protect them as much, yesterday's QBs would find it difficult to operate with the precision, responsibility, knowledge, and accuracy of Peyton Manning and his acolytes. Manning's command of the game is simply on a different level, he's the most distinctive QB to ever play the game. Watching Manning play the game is simply different from watching anyone else play the game. If I trust what I've read, the analog here is basically Unitas and no one else.
Mannning I agree on but i really think brady would have struggled being hit like the old qbs used to. Elway would take 6-7 hits after the throw a game that would be flags nowdays.

Also not sure going up against Larwence Taylors, Howie Longs, Greg Townsends, D. Thomas, Neil Smiths, Atwaters, Lotts etc was any easier then going against defense nowdays. IMO they were much more vicious 15 yrs ago.

Whtaever though one point stands for sure. That todays stats skewed compared to qbs like Jim Kelly and Dan Marino, Elway, Montana etc etc. Montana would be like Drew Brees in todays game. You simple wouldn't get to touch him much.
cutthemdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2012, 03:28 AM   #21
Lycan
Omelette Dreamer
 
Lycan's Avatar
 

Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,474
Default

For me it's: Elway, Montana, Marino, Manning.

The four best QB's of all time IMO.
Lycan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2012, 08:19 AM   #22
DENVERDUI55
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lycan View Post
For me it's: Elway, Montana, Marino, Manning.

The four best QB's of all time IMO.
This is what I think too. Helps that is my era of players too.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2012, 09:07 AM   #23
HorseHead
Ring of Famer
 
HorseHead's Avatar
 
Stay thirsty my friends..

Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,395

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Bay Bay
Default

I disagree with the above that Elway will be "tier 2 qb" when all is said and done. After this next wave..

Actually, I think Elway's stock has risen, and has been cemented irregardless of stats.

In many ways, the QB's you see today have Elway's style DNA written all over their play..(RG 3 , Cam etc.)

In many ways he was the prototype...
HorseHead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2012, 10:51 AM   #24
gunns
I WANT DEFENSE!
 
gunns's Avatar
 
Defense, defense, defense

Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Always Hoping
Posts: 12,443

Adopt-a-Bronco:
TJ Ward
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HorseHead View Post
I disagree with the above that Elway will be "tier 2 qb" when all is said and done. After this next wave..

Actually, I think Elway's stock has risen, and has been cemented irregardless of stats.

In many ways, the QB's you see today have Elway's style DNA written all over their play..(RG 3 , Cam etc.)

In many ways he was the prototype...
I agree. Montana had a team to work with and make him look very good. Not saying he wasn't but one does have to wonder if there would have been that much success without it. Marino had the quick release plus accuracy BUT he also had some great WR tandems. Elway was one of the great athletes at the position and one of the few players I've ever seen carrying teams on his back.

Unitas definitely should be up there. Namath not so much as far as QB play, Bradshaw either, he didn't win 4 SB's, his defenses did.
gunns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2012, 10:06 PM   #25
Cito Pelon
Attack at all times . . .
 
Cito Pelon's Avatar
 
Not2Shabby County Seat

Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: AFC Championshipville, NotTooShabby County
Posts: 16,256

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Slim Shabby
Default

I was looking at the stats for QBs, and I saw Dave Krieg is 12th alltime in yds and 12th alltime in TD passes. Dave Krieg, from Milton College, dude was like a walkon to the Seahawks and ends up 12th alltime in yds and TD passes. Won some playoff games also. Back then people thought Seattle was gonna be a joke forever, but then along came Krieg and Largent.
Cito Pelon is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes



Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:07 AM.


Denver Broncos