View Single Post
Old 01-19-2013, 01:27 PM   #917
Ring of Famer

Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 5,904


Originally Posted by BroncoBeavis View Post
Hey thanks, another nice piece of support for my position.

That piece showcases a situation where the FFC tried to assert authority to do something based on 'protecting the children' from inadvertent exposure to indecent material (via signal bleed) that the supreme court didn't accept because they found it unconstitutional given that that were other reasonable means to prevent that inadvertent access.

Has exactly nada to do with RF spectrum use.
Fedaykin is offline   Reply With Quote