Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Blueflame
Clinton has nothing to do with the list Spider posted,
|
Indeed - it was Spider who was attempting to use the list as a defense of sorts of Clinton. That's why he made his comment that I quoted.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Blueflame
That "Some" in the thread title means that he was castigating those Republicans whose names were on the list and no one else. How is posting the truth a "cheap shot"?
|
What's the relationship between the actions of some men whose last name is "Kennedy" with all individuals named "Kennedy"? Is there one? If not, then what does the list have to do with Republicans generally? Nothing - and since that's the case, what was Spider attempting to do with the list? Smearing Republicans - and that's all.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Blueflame
It is very puzzling why Libertarians seem to take such issue with the (apparently well-justified) criticism of "some" Republicans....
|
I take issue with cheap shots of exactly the sort Spider has proffered with this thread.
There's far more substantive issues that are directly related to Republicanism as an ideology that can be debated, not the crap that this list represents.