Quote:
|
Originally Posted by §Pide®
Yeah funny thing about 2 consenting Adults knocking boots , and a group that knocks boots with Children .......
|
The existence of 40-some-odd Republican pedophiles means no Republican can ever criticize Clinton's adultery? Why?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by §Pide®
Thats not my department ........
|
Well, if your rule only applies to adultery/pedophilia but nothing else, it's not very general, is it?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by §Pide®
define the word Some ....... get back to me as soon as you have it figured out .... Alrighty then ....
|
I didn't use the word "some".
I said: "I don't take the actions of person X of group Y as indicting group Y as a whole as a general rule."
What does the existence of a person X who commits reprehensible act Z imply about the various groups A, B, and C to which X can be considered a member, §Pide®? Anything? Nothing at all? Something - like what?