Originally Posted by W*GS
The wealthiest members of the Senate are Democrats - and the most recent Democratic nominee for President was the wealthiest member in the entire Congress, if I'm not mistaken.
Which party runs on standing up for the working man?
Which party claims to be for the poor?
How does that square with the incredible wealth held by the top Democrats?
Therein lies your problem W*GS. It "squares" like this. I would submit to you that simply being wealthy doesn't mean you can't have empathy for the "working man", or be the party of the "poor". The Democratic Party and it's members have been the prime architects of all
of this country's social and societal benefits. Yes, some of the wealthiest Congressmen happen to be Democrats; but they also happen to be some of the most compassionate as well. I guess you would rather have the Dems subscribe to the old "I've got mine, *uck everyone else" song and dance of the Republicans? Your thinking is flawed and your logic is twisted.
Lastly, Spider was dead on in his assesment. How you could take a list of Republican pedophiles and come up with "all politicians are scum" is incomprehensible. Its people like you who somehow turn a blind eye to this crap that makes me fear for the future of this country.