View Single Post
Old 03-22-2005, 10:38 AM   #9
labronco
Ring of Famer
 
labronco's Avatar
 

Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,015
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco
Why would you draft a guy specifically for this job? It's an important job...but special teams is a team....if all 11 guys do what they're supposed to do you get good consistent returns. The Chiefs didn't draft Dante Hall to be a return man...he just fell into the job...they drafted him to play WR as well. A laugh at the notion that we can't find a guy on the roster that can do this job(Droughns). My point is draft a guy...for his DB skills....if he can return punts and kicks...it's a bonus...but can he contribute at an offensive or defensive position first....
yo, garcia.

dante was drafted for a specific purpose as a return man. if it weren't for his return skills, he probably would not have been drafted at all.

http://www.cheddarheads.co.uk/hof/dante.htm

my point is this. in later rounds, most teams draft multi purpose players with potential to contribute as a special teamer. they may be jack of all trades, but most don't make the team. since it's a gamble anyway, why not pick a player with an obvious, proven return skill, instead of a "pontential" for a return man, maybe because of 40yd time? a risk is a risk when it's not conventional.
labronco is offline   Reply With Quote