Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic2
I'll break this down for you since you can't understand the difference. It's the WAY he's using executive order. He's using them to alter his own legislation. If congress won't act its one thing, but when congress passes the legislation he's changing that's totally different. That's a joke. He's used executive order to PREVENT legislation from going through(Rubio/dream act scenario). Then he commands sweeping executive power on some issues, while saying he's got no power on other issues. He's a joke.
BS. Just cause you and other conservatives out there don't like it doesn't mean his EOs are any less valid/legal as they were in any previous admin.