View Single Post
Old 06-23-2014, 01:02 PM   #163
broncocalijohn
Famer of Rings
 
broncocalijohn's Avatar
 
I said Do It!

Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Lake Forest, Orange County, Calif.
Posts: 23,414

Adopt-a-Bronco:
Simon Fletcher
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BroncoBuff View Post
I'm sure somebody mentioned this ... hope so, cause this point should end the debate. They're labeling THEMSELVES Redskins, because fans and players and staff respect and admire the men and their image. Enough to adorn their bodies, homes and cars with expensive "Redskins" clothing and paraphernalia.

ALL mascot/nicknames are chosen because of the nherany for inherent qualities of to represent qualities of strength, excellence, victory. To instill pride and loyalty. That's why you don't see names like Cincinnati Sloths or Pittsburgh Plastics. It's Seahawks, not buzzards ... Bengals not bungholes.


Is there any Native American polling on this issue?
Yes there was and it was over 82% did not think Redskins should be changed or offensive.
broncocalijohn is offline   Reply With Quote