Thread: Maleficent 5/30
View Single Post
Old 05-21-2014, 11:51 AM   #58
91BRONCO
Seasoned Veteran
 
New to the Forum

Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 348

Adopt-a-Bronco:
None
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by v2micca View Post
Actually, it was less a remake and more of a better adaptation of existing source material. One that was a vast improvement over the previous adaptation, kind of like The Maltese Falcon (1941) was an improvement over The Maltese Falcon (1931), or like The Wizard of Oz (1939) was better than The Wizard of Oz (1925), and you can always pick your favorite version of Les Miserables (1952, 1978, 1998, 2000, 2012) But yeah, apparently Hollywood revisiting existing properties has never lead to anything worth while.
I never said that- what I am saying is that remakes/reinterpretations are too prevalent these days so the majority are worth skipping.

Am I shocked that the Godzilla reviews on here are not that good? No, it's pretty much a given that it would be average at best. It may have missed that mark as well though....
91BRONCO is offline   Reply With Quote