Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN
But if and when it does, you can always count on some conservative to oppose it.
Odds are you believe Hitler was a socialist as well.
Thanks, Fox News.
I'm using your (shallowest possible) definition. Where "Change" = "Progress"
In the real world that definition doesn't work. Because the way you define it, everyone would be in both camps all the time. I mean you're basically calling yourself a Crunchy Entitlement State Conservative.
"Conservative" vs "Liberal" can only be applied to people's views on foundational principles. You're trying to define it as Changiness vs Non-Changiness. Which really makes no sense when you think about it. There are many things today's most radical progressives would fight to protect from change. And things most hardcore conservatives would love to upend tomorrow.