View Single Post
Old 09-12-2013, 04:03 PM   #75
BroncoBeavis
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rohirrim View Post
Beavis' argument is that the sheer volume of signs leading to the confirmation of AGW is proof that it can't be true.
It's not the sheer volume of signs that indicates a problem. It's the number of places alarmists keep looking for signs.

If your search for global climate truth lands you looking around a certain town or state with some flooding, you're not really looking for truth in the first place.
  Reply With Quote