Originally Posted by Rohirrim
Beavis' argument is that the sheer volume of signs leading to the confirmation of AGW is proof that it can't be true.
It's not the sheer volume of signs that indicates a problem. It's the number of places alarmists keep looking for signs.
If your search for global climate truth lands you looking around a certain town or state with some flooding, you're not really looking for truth in the first place.