Originally Posted by Rohirrim
Nobody is arguing about the science. We're talking about the policy implications of such a finding and trying to understand why you would, on the one hand, cherry pick this particular study out of the world of science and post it on this board, and then refuse to openly state what you think the implications of such a study are.
But in fact you ARE Anti Science for the simple fact that you and your ilk support artificial outcomes via government led programs. I already stated the implications of the study; outcomes will never be equal unless artificial intervention takes place in the form of AA and quotas. This and other studies explain why. Artificial intervention makes our country weaker. The Broncos holding a roster spot for 5.5 second 40 yard dash running WR is the perfect analogy for it....