Originally Posted by txtebow
See post #7. You're projecting your own personal biases onto me and my original point. Tried and true, when you are backed into a corner by fact simply yell "racism!"
You're the one who brought up the study. I'm just trying to get you to admit what the policy implications are. That's what it's all about. Even the writer sums up the article with that point.
You tell me what the policy implications are.
As far as your post #7 goes, that's the exact opposite policy I would expect from such a scientific finding. Seems to be that race-based special treatment should expand, not contract, in the interest of helping those who need the most help. Right?