Originally Posted by houghtam
Technology is great, but if the family cannot afford to pay for the technology to keep its child alive, then is the answer really "welp, you shouldn't have gotten pregnant in the first place"? Are people really suggesting that you should not have children (and thus not have sex) until you are financially prepared to pay for all contingencies for your child's birth? Watch the birth rate go down to zero.
This is one of your dumber arguments. It's not about doctor bills. It's about viability and personhood. There is a line somewhere. Where?
Otherwise Kermie was just providing a "valuable" public service. Free Kermie!