Originally Posted by BroncoBeavis
With these you're comparing Apples and Horses. These programs don't lock out outside spending. Essentially, they're like the public funding we already have for Presidential candidates already today. There's just less big money competition for the public funding because there's little functional power to be bought in local elections (which is kinda my point)
Explain how I'm comparing 'apples to horses'? Whatever you think that means.
I had already mentioned the need for campaign finance reform.
How about finding ways to make something work instead of just finding ways to say no while have nothing to contribute??
What have you got as an alternative to the blatant corruption??