Originally Posted by Fedaykin
Can we stop with the idiotic false equivalences here? Testicles are not comparable to breasts in terms of "necessity". Once again, she decided against removing her ovaries, ostensibly because she didn't think the tradeoff was good enough (at this time).
The real (general) comparison is, would you accept what is essentially a purely cosmetic alteration (and a minor one at that, comparable to the alteration that millions of people make for non-medical purposes) of your body if you were told not doing so would almost certainly lead to a deadly disease?
You keep saying this but it is not a simple cosmetic procedure. This is not a breast augmentation it is the complete removal of all breast tissue - BIG difference.
You are an obnoxious poster that continually demands fully documented posts from others yet you feel comfortable shooting from the hip in your posts.
Heres one for you. The cancer industry is not about to give up it's billions of dollars by seeking and finding a cure for their cash cow. Of course not all doctors are involved but the take their direction from the very powerful pharmaceutical companies who control the AMA. There are cures that have been repressed and discredited by the self serving AMA Do some research on this you might find it humbling.
Here I'll get you started; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0psJhQHk_GI
YOU WILL NOT FIND THE DOCUMENTATION YOU DEMAND TO PROVE ALTERNATIVE CURES FORM THE VERY SYSTEM THAT HAS SUPPRESSED ALTERNATE MEDICINE FOR DECADES ESPECIALLY THOSE THAT WORK .