Thread: Woodson
View Single Post
Old 05-18-2013, 09:56 PM   #213
Drunken.Broncoholic
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bmore Manning View Post
I'm not saying I agree with cutthemdown, but Woodson's play has declined. And if we were worried about Q.C's long term health, then we should have taken a true safety and not a DB who's raw but has crazy potential at CB, but is physical so people think he should play safety. There were plenty of safeties on the board, still not sure why so many think Webster will be playing safety for us.. Maybe I'm wrong, and he will.. But if Woodson was brought in to be a matchup DB verse the TE then that's a quality move.. But an everyday starter at SS, thanks but no thanks. And I watch every game, because I love football, and I will verify that Woodson's physical skills are in decline, mostly due to father time.

Situational player? Yes please.. starting strong safety? No thanks. I would like to see some physicality back there.. A strong safety who can separate the ball from the player, and a free safety who is a ball hawk, turnover machine.
Pretty much this. He was targeted alot last year for a reason. Chances you'll get a rod Woodson type performance in late 30s is slim. I want a safety that's gonna hold up until the playoffs. Dawkins is an example of Father Time taking him out of the playoffs.
  Reply With Quote