Originally Posted by BroncoBeavis
You kids are funny. One says we shouldn't comment at all until every fact is out on the table. The other says we should only talk about how to fix a problem we don't even fully understand yet because all the facts aren't out on the table.
I don't usually subscribe to the further-regulate-and-reform approach to this sort of thing. Government runs farthest amok when it is charged to do things it never should have been doing in the first place.
The mere fact that they have to ask "what kind of speech is tax exempt" is your first clue that something isn't quite right.
Please elaborate. What exactly is the government not supposed to be doing in this case? Offering tax exemptions? Or should they offer exemptions to any organization that applies for it? Or are you insinuating that the government has no business taxing at all?
I'm curious to hear your response. A direct response would be nice, but I will settle for one of your traditional skip-to-my-loo responses.