Originally Posted by Drunken.Broncoholic
A few years ago? Hell ya. Today? Ill pass. Teams targeted Woodson all last year(in games he was actually healthy enough to play) which resulted in him getting abused. Was among the worst in ratio of snaps to targets. Was in the bottom 10 in yards allowed per snaps in coverage and snaps per reception allowed. We already got that in Moore and Adams. They allow too many completed passes too.
When SF thinks a rookie is a better option than Woodson that should be a sign. Maybe they didnt want to spend money, or maybe they realize his skills are dropping and teams knew that last year by attacking him.
What if Woodson was playing last year against the Ravens instead of Moore?