Originally Posted by houghtam
The validity and bias of IQ tests is debated at even the lowest levels of psychology at the collegiate level. Unless you care to question the professors at Valparaiso, Michigan State an U. of Cincinnati where I took 3 years of educational psychology. Have you ever read Culture-Fair Cognitive Ability Assessment: Information Processing and Psychophysiological Approaches?
Have you ever actually taken a post-secondary course? Considering your epic failure in the last few threads, I'm beginning to think you're too stupid to pull off the dramallama/nyuk nyuk exchange.
Epic failure where? Basic college freshman psychology - regardless of what textbook you use and who you take it with - teaches that IQ has been shown to be valid. Is there some dissent? Yes - but its validity is the accepted norm while you point at the small minority. Developmental psychology teaches the same about IQ and also that adopted twin longevity studies show IQ among other characteristics to have a heavy genetic input. I asked for information we can reasonably look up, not anecdote or hearsay or muscle flexing.
You said there was something in the video on the OP itself that had data we could look up. I didn't watch it all but did scroll through it and found no such thing. I saw something about Latino crime rates and an angry Latino guy.
Now let me ask one more time: What information do you have that shows the man you're railing against is "racist" other than that you don't like he mentioned data that isn't bathed in equals signs? Dealing with blind liberals such as yourself is like dealing with religious extremists; you both hate scientific data that contradicts your faith. You hate it and you persecute and demonize those who say otherwise.
You also claimed that IQ isn't the point of your grudge against him. What in fact, then, is? What makes him "racist"?