Originally Posted by TonyR
Wait, you mean it's okay to use The Daily Beast as a source?!? Even though it might have a liberal bias?!?
Sorry, Beavis, this article doesn't help your "case" (as if you had one here lol). Sure, Limbaugh may have hit some periods of decline. But still, as the article states...
^ That's the salient point you seem unable, or unwilling, to wrap your little head around. If I have to further elaborate then I'm clearly wasting my time.
I think you're missing the base point. Being the 'king' of talk radio in and of itself proves nothing. Political talk really isn't all that influential. As evidenced by the fact that Republican voters appeared to do exactly the opposite of what the "giant in his field" wanted them to. This is the antithesis of"influence"