Originally Posted by TonyR
Stop concerning yourself with the sources and look at the content. You're smart enough to wade through the bias to the extent it exists.
They're your articles. You make the argument for why they help your case. Just browsing the first one, it seems to quote one (blowhard) pollster who thinks Limbaugh presents some image problems. Even assuming that's the case, imaging problems don't equal influence.
Maybe there's a needle of an argument in these haystacks of words you linked. But I know their motivation. It shouldn't be up to me to sift through it to try to make your argument for you.
Salon.com, MM and MJ WANT Limbaugh to be the face of the Republican party. Now show me where they proved that he actually IS.