Originally Posted by TonyR
Don't shoot the messenger, but you have to admit that this is a good and interesting point:
Gosnell is precisely the kind of butcher the pro-choice movement opposes. No one endorses bad medicine and unrestricted, unregulated, cowboy surgery like Gosnell practiced — what he represents is the kind of back-alley deadly hackery that the anti-choice movement would have as the only possible recourse, if they had their way. If anything, the Gosnell case is an argument for legal abortion.
But, abortions are legal
..... and we were told numerous times that legalizing abortions would prevent this **** from happening.....so please explain why it happened?