Originally Posted by peacepipe
Trigger locks? Haven't heard anything about those in yrs. So I don't know what libs are calling for it.
The point being ARs can constitutionally be banned/regulated further.
Why fixate on ARs when such weapons are used in less than 1% of gun murders and less than 25% of mass shootings? Sounds like feel-good thumb sucking to me.
Even the last "assault weapons ban" didn't ban them, they merely outlawed certain irrelevant physical aspects of it. The gun itself was always still legal.