Originally Posted by nyuk nyuk
The least thing you can do is explain how I'm contradicting myself if you think I am doing so. We're either going to ban that which kills or not? Why single out something that is actually lower-end on the homicide scale? There's nothing rational behind such reasoning, and it's a stretch to call it reasoning at all.
first you use the argument that knives kill more people than guns,then you say that both guns and knives cause flesh wounds.so you're saying that knives are more lethal than guns.you can't ban everything that kills people,guns are designed to kill,cars are not, most knives are not.