Originally Posted by Bronco_Beerslug
Again, Bush's economic policies benefit the wealthy, not middle America.
He spends more than any other president in history while cutting revenues.
He proposes programs but doesn't fund them or explain how they'll be funded, *No Child Left Behind* as one example.
Isn't it ironic that you complain on the one hand that Bush "spends more than any other president in history" and then turn right around and complain that he "proposes programs but doesn't fund them?" Seriously, which part bothers you more because they are kind of inconsistent complaints don't you think?
Not to mention the fact that Congress has a major role in all this.