Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ
no, and wrong. Like Crick wrong.
You can't argue with 12.5 sacks, 85 tackles, and 21 TFL's as a Junior. Speed, size, strength, height...none of it is important (as Dumervil, and Suggs have shown).
The only thing that's important is "can this guy pressure and sack the Quarterback on a consistent basis"?
Damontre Moore fits the bill. He's not a one year wonder (72 tackles, 8.5 sacks, and 17.5 TFL's as a Sophomore).
Oh, and BTW...he's only 20 years old.