Originally Posted by nyuk nyuk
No, it's because it was a cellphone and I had to lighten it to make it look more like it looked with the naked eye, otherwise it comes out way darker than it looks.
LMAO. So we can add 'doesn't know **** about cameras' to your description. Doesn't matter if it's a crappy little cell phone or a $10,000 professional gear, the artifacts (particularly the graininess) I point out are a direct result of having a high ISO setting.
Would you like me to demonstrate later tonight with my $1,800 camera?
Oh, and nice to see you admit you were digitally manipulating the image
too. Good job!
Simply visiting there yourself will put a stop to all of this silly speculation.
Been to hundreds of movies in dozens of theaters. Looks nothing like your manipulated image