Originally Posted by errand
Yes because the size of the magazine will prevent people from being killed, correct?
You clowns argue that if we limit the number of rounds in a magazine a potential shooter can be rushed and taken down and subdued....
Look you dumb ass..............the shooter has been taken down in multiple shootings when he trird to reload..........its a fact.
I realize you stupid ****s don't read or comprehend much , let alone recent history.
Your gawd damn right to carry a bazooka is not at risk here just the fact that smaller ammo clips would have already saved lies and would do so in the future.
You haven't a leg to stand on here, period.
Poor you having to reload a couple extra times versus saving a few lives ?
WHAT KIND OF SCUMBAG ARE YOU PEOPLE THAT THINK YOUR BEING INCONVENIENCED RELOADING A COUPLE EXTRA TIMES WHEN IT WOULD HAVE ALREADY SAVED LIVES....?
Tired of all your stupidity and unwillingness to be slightly inconvenienced when you know damn well in multiple instances these have been taken down trying to reload,,,,,,,,,,,,because you may very well be a damn fast and efficient reloading mother ****er until your under fire or in the real world.