Originally Posted by Rabb
Maybe because the constitution allows us to own weapons "in common use for lawful purposes"...not "in common use for lawful purposes, but with a small magazine"
Take a Glock 17 or an AR 15, both perfectly legal and widely popular weapons for home defense. What does this do for people wanting them going forward?
I realize opinions vary here, I just think it's a very dangerous foot in the door to an amendment that is pretty important.
I wonder how many rounds are in the magazines of Secret Service agents, police and other personal protectors of legislators? I mean if my life is only worth 10 rounds why aren't theirs?
Are the president's children more important than mine or yours? I don't think so.....
Still haven't heard one plan on keeping guns out of the hands of criminals......