Originally Posted by TheReverend
As of now, still would've been better for the team.
Said back then we were going to have nightmares covering up the middle in a perma 43 under/52 look. Meanwhile, not a single tight end has been covered since and we just lost a playoff game due to no pressure and poor one on one coverage.
Sooooooooooooooooooooo yeah.... Good slam...?
Also, we can call Sherman better when he matches up against the opposing #1 all game.
Dude, totally kidding you
I think Miller makes more sense, but PP is no slouch either. And I think Sherman is overrated, but still a tremendous value. I wanted him badly, but someone got him right in front of me. Plus, he is very scheme dependent where as PP is more versatile.