Originally Posted by peacepipe
He,as stated in the article, has a very"free market" way of dealing with this. Do you think RP is first MFer to have this happen. I don't know who's worse RP or the dumb saps that believe in him.
There's still some legal grey area, but for the most part, trademark law has already been ruled as binding over domain registration. They're essentially asking him to pay for what he already owns. Grabbing something that legally belongs to someone else, and then demanding they pay for it is anything but "free market" RP is looking to resolve the issue through the organization with jurisdiction over the issue. No ideology is in conflict.
But as far as the P-nuts go, RP's just reaping what he's sown over the years.