View Single Post
Old 01-25-2013, 01:21 PM   #192
mhgaffney
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,308
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DenverBrit View Post
Gaffney, you're posting the conclusion I already posted. This is all you have??

Where's the FEMA report that mentions 'demolition' or 'thermite'??

Only the uneducated and unqualified troofers, motivated by greed, invented the 'demolition' and 'thermite' story, a fairy tale that has been debunked repeatedly and years ago.

Your fellow con man, Gage has been outed and disowned by AIA, yet here you are, the organic gardener, spouting and speculating about things of which you have absolutely no knowledge.

You're a joke.

As usual, you chose to ignore the conclusions of the report that dealt with the twin towers. Why?

It's obvious, the report blows the troofer conspiracy bull**** out of the water.

From Chapter 8.



Nice try, Gaffney.
We have been talking primarily about Building 7 -- which suffered no plane impact -- hence no jet fuel.

The metallurgical paper was a study of steel samples from WTC-7. As I have just shown, the authors were at a loss to explain how steel was melted -- even evaporated. The samples looked like Swiss cheese.

You have posted claims that the sulfur causing the eutectic phenomenon came from burning organic compounds in the building.

You pulled this material from your favorite debunker site -- without even giving the name of a scientist. So which expert reached this conclusion?

Anonymous experts are a joke. Serious scientists attach their names their work.

MHG
mhgaffney is offline   Reply With Quote