View Single Post
Old 01-24-2013, 12:54 PM   #252
MacGruder
Guest
 

Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2KBack View Post
You don't have a goddamn point.

I used ot hink you were crazy...now I think you are just dumb.

the only passing statistic affected by running the ball is passing attempts....that's it. Completion % is based on how often the ball you passed is caught by another member of the team. If you run....there is no attempt. If there is no attempt...there is no catch/incompletion. Without those two things, there can be no Passing %. The fact that he has such a low% spits in the face of your claim he is the efficient QB. 63% of the time he threw the ball....something negative happened.


You are dumb
The point is.. what if you remove the running attempt and instead insert a short yardage passing attempt in it's place and add those yards to the passing numbers and efficiency?

How many times did Orton pad his stats with short passing attempts? Same thing... Or screen passes.. Fox wouldn't let Tebow even use screens because they didn't fit in with his philosophy..

Even Elway admitted Tebow's numbers were down because he was told to throw deep so much.. that facilitated Fox's run heavy style..

You know what all those short passing attempts guys like Orton and Peyton use do to your run game? They kill it...

Last edited by MacGruder; 01-24-2013 at 12:58 PM..