View Single Post
Old 01-21-2013, 02:23 PM   #162
mhgaffney
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 11,204
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DenverBrit View Post


Gaffney's monkey with another simplistic analysis.

Here, read the facts.

An Initial Microstructural Analysis of A36 Steel from WTC Building 7


ANALYSIS

http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM...rman-0112.html
Hilarious.

Brit cites the FEMA paper -- which was an appendix to the FEMA report on the WTC collapse -- without comprehending its significance. Yes the FEMA study of WTC-7 steel confirmed that steel had melted -- evaporated in fact.

But not because of burning jet fuel or building fires. This is what Brit fails to comprehend.

If you read the FEMA analysis you will see that the FEMA scientists were at a loss to explain what they had found.

It is highly significant that NIST ignored their research. Which should have been a starting point for the NIST investigation. But there is no mention of the FEMA paper in the 10,000 page NIST report on the WTC collapse, released in 2005.

The materials scientists who did the FEMA paper are today among the many experts who dispute the official story.

The evaporated steel is consistent with the use of explosives.

Thanks Brit. I have posted the FEMA paper many times on this board
-- but no one in here listens. In your ignorance you have helped advance the cause of 9/11 truth.
MHG

Last edited by mhgaffney; 01-21-2013 at 02:27 PM..
mhgaffney is offline   Reply With Quote