View Single Post
Old 01-11-2013, 03:02 PM   #90
mhgaffney
Ring of Famer
 

Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 10,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DenverBrit View Post
This what NIST said, but keep repeating the same troofer BS.

From the NIST website, 2011, which nicely summarizes the final report.

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC Towers Investigation
6. What caused the collapses of WTC 1 and WTC 2?

http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudi..._wtctowers.cfm

And from a recent Purdue University study.


http://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/resea...1Varma911.html

What sources are you using, Gaffney? Unicorns? the idiot, Gage?
I posted my first paper on the WTC collapse -- a critique of the NIST report -- in December 2006.

I reposted a slightly updated version the following year.

The only error that emerged was a typo -- I mis stated the name NIST. The paper has otherwise held up.

I've posted it on this board several times. Here's the link. I challenge you to read it -- but of course to understand it you would also have to study the NIST Report -- an investment of time I'm sure you are not ready to make.

As Allen Dulles said "Americans don't read reports..."

MHG

Still Dead on Arrival:
http://www.informationclearinghouse....ticle18999.htm
mhgaffney is offline   Reply With Quote