Originally Posted by BroncoLifer
So I've been looking (hfboards mostly) trying to figure out what either side got out of the deal that required losing half the season. So far as I can tell, the final agreement is very close to what the sides had on the table back in Sep/Oct and whatever gain either side may have made was offset by the loss of half a year's revenue/salaries.
Is that wrong? In the end, was there really anything other than personalities that lost us so many games?
ask the owners...they are the ones that locked out the players