Originally Posted by DAN_BRONCO_FAN
gee neither was OJ . he was proven innocent of murder the glove did not fit you got to acquit too bad those was his shoes i dont care he is a murderer or accomplice .
he is as guilty as oj justice wasnt served lack of evidence
Just on a technicality here, OJ was not proven innocent, he was just not found guilty.
There is a BIG difference between the two.
Being found not guilty just means there was not enough evidence to convict. Being found innocent means there was plenty of evidence to support that one did NOT commit the crime.