View Single Post
Old 01-05-2013, 05:49 PM   #8
DenverBrit
Just hanging out.
 
DenverBrit's Avatar
 
Got a breath mint??

Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Denver
Posts: 12,423

Adopt-a-Bronco:
The Team
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhgaffney View Post
The principle of physics he is explaining is valid. Try using your pea sized brain to understand what he is saying.

The upper floors of the WTC disintegrated before our eyes -- turned to dust -- and therefor cannot provide the mass which (we are told) caused the "classical collapse"

Of course, there is no such thing as a "classical collapse" when it comes to high rise steel buildings. Not a one had ever failed before 9/11 -- nor has any since - though three (count them, 1,2,3) failed on that one day.

Nor have the collapses been explained satisfactorily (except by us conspiracy theorists). 1700 architects and engineers now agree.

MHG
Absolute nonsense, but believing that bs is crucial for the troofers and their wacky conspiracy theories.
Without that lie, they have NOTHING but money grubbing schemes to fleece the gullible.

Gaffeny, this crap was put to bed years ago. Get a ****ing life!

http://www.debunking911.com/freefall.htm
DenverBrit is offline   Reply With Quote