Originally Posted by Blueflame
While my political ideology is similar to LABF's, it would be inaccurate to say that I unilaterally agree with everything he posts.
I certainly have yet to see this statement backed up in deed.
I won't hold my breath.
"You see, what LABS meant
to say when he mocked the 9/11 commission as a fraud and then used it to back a point on Bill Clinton is that he didn't mean that the whole commission was a fraud because when he mocked the commission, the commission wasn't cited as a whole thing of the thing he was mocking, you see, so he didn't mean there were no facts in the fraud...er..Where was I going with this?"