Originally Posted by BroncoBeavis
Yeah, totally. There's no way that a bunch of guys who just violently overthrew their government would think it necessary to protect the ability to violently resist a government.
Luckily their words left you little material with which to delude yourself.
(as Constitutional as Separation of Church and State)
Gotcha, so are you in agreement with Scalia's interpretation of the 2nd Amendment, that any
bearable arms are protected? Should I be able to own a rocket launcher or a military grade sniper rifle with a silencer? Where do you draw the line? From what basis?