Originally Posted by BroncoInferno
Of course not. What I'm saying is that folks like you wish to seperate the guns themselves from the equation. But we don't do that with alcohol. We makes protective laws not based on harm caused to others, but based on the potential of harm that could be caused to another. And no one argues against those laws, because it's obvious that a drunk driver is a danger to others on the road. It's similarly obvious that someone possessing, say, a semi-automatic rifle, poses an increased danger to those he/she encounters.
No. You've declared the car an "alcohol-free zone" to little effect. Sound familiar?