Originally Posted by Kid A
For it to make sense we need a point of comparison. Like "Pre-2005 Super Bowl winners had won a combined X games on the road. Super Bowl winners since 2005 have won 12."
Yep, a better explanation would have made his stat make more sense. I'm assuming that he is saying that Super Bowl winners have come from lower seeds more often over the past several years, meaning that they have had to win more road games.
When I first read the stat, my thought was "no s&*t homie, of course they're undefeated." lol