Originally Posted by Mile High Shack
Personally I don't care either way....I'm sick of hearing about Kerry and 'Nam.
What does his service for 4 months in 'Nam have anything to do with his presidency bid?
He shouldn't of tried to wrap himself around his service record to try and show how "tough" he was on defense....when his voting record obviously depicts otherwise.
That's what I'm more concerned about is his senate voting record of being very soft on defense.
That's just it, Heinz-Kerry doesn't have anything else to run on, other than he served in Viet Nam.
He seems to think, as do the democrats, that his Viet Nam service qualifies him to be President, yet relly offers no reasons why.
As for the guy retracting what he said, there's still plenty of others to back up what they said.