Originally Posted by That One Guy
I'm not reading the thread (circle jerk as was mentioned early on) and won't be back, probably, to read any responses but I think it's pretty telling how the title of the thread is written. The "my team is winning" logic is so important that rather than have a reasonable opposition party so there's always a check, the OP would rather Rs keep providing no alternative so the Ds can keep winning.
Wouldn't a reasonable opposition party be better than no choice whatsoever?
Sure, a "reasonable" opposition party is fine with me.