Quote:
Originally Posted by L.A. BRONCOS FAN
Mon Oct 29, 2012 at 03:56 AM PDT
Nate Silver singlehandedly dismantling the myth of Mitt-mentum
The Telegraph, one of the UK's better, if editorially right-of-centre, newspapers, has an interesting article about Nate Silver this morning:
Nate Silver, the geeky statistician who is singlehandedly dismantling the myth of Mitt-mentum
It's by Dan Hodges, a "Blairite cuckoo in the Miliband nest":
Where most political commentators output is the product of briefings, gossip and personal perception, Silver deals in cold, hard facts. And at the moment, Silver’s facts are being fired like bullets into the heart of the Romney campaign. Over the past week Romney has had a clear strategy; give the impression of momentum. Demonstrate the post-debate surge is continuing. Get people talking about how the race is his to lose.
Nate Silver is Mitt Romney’s nemesis. Not intentionally; although he admits to being an Obama supporter, his whole career is predicated on getting his predictions right. Like he did in 2008, when "Poblano" accurately predicted the result of 49 of the 50 states, and all 35 senate races. And it is that reputation for accuracy that is so damaging to the Romney campaign’s attempt to sustain their precious “momentum” narrative. People listen to Silver. And over the past 48 hours, the narrative is starting to shift. “Mitt-mentum? Not so fast” – US News & World report. “Romney’s Momentum Seems To Have Stopped. “The momentum myth” – Washington Post.
|
Like I said before, we all know how the Right "feels" about science.
Like they say about climate change, why pay attention to a bunch of scientific "models" when I can just go outside and check the weather on my own. Hell, it just snowed. What's that do to your global warming, eh?