Originally Posted by lonestar
did I say that?
I said beating a team that had IIRC and OT playing OC because their first two OCs were out.. Playing without their starting Safety in both games, while I realize next man up is a great..
playing without many starters and not just starters but their studs and then claiming how great we are .. is dishonorable..
I prefer going against their best and if we win great if not then it means LIKE WE ALREADY know we have improvements to be made..
If you want the cheap win fine someday you may feel different..
But as everyone saw with us getting our ass kicked the following games just showed how weak we were..
Feel like you want It does not change my thoughts on the game.. we beat barely a weakened team.. and then lost out on potentially better players because of it..
AGAIN losing a close game to a great team is not gutting wrenching ordeal..
Like it is apparently to a few of you..
If we did not win the Lombardi it was not worth it to me..
I know your memory might be losing touch with you but I guess you also don't give a **** about the game vs the Oilers in the playoffs to comeback to kick a fieldgoal with our two 4th and long completions on the last drive, The Drive 1 and The Drive 2 against Cleveland. That big win vs the Raiders in 1977? Doesn't mean **** to you Lonestar since we didn't win the Lombardi.
You are one old POS as you would rather take great history away for the sake of not getting the Lombardi. Because a season is a complete waste unless you win the Lombardi from 31 other teams.