Originally Posted by Dexter
I can understand the point you're trying to make in regards to the whole Bush thing. And I'm not even sure if missouribronc is an Independent. But can we stop ****ting on independents around here?
Unless independents want to pretty much throw their vote away, there really are only two sides to vote for. Just because someone votes for one party one time, doesn't meant they're always going to lean that way. I know I'm damn willing to vote Republican if they ever stop nominating extremists and/or idiots.
I just don't think it's really respectful to always make the assumption above that people who claim to be independents are generally liars. Maybe my reading comprehension is just **** though and I'm confused. I'm tired, its 3: A.M. what the hell am I doing awake?
Nope, I've been reading this guy's verbal diarrhea for months. Never once has he made a post that could even remotely identified as non-conservative. He quotes Fox News, he thinks homosexuality is a choice, he doesn't see anything wrong with disenfranchising minorities through electoral year shenanigans... The only way he could conceivably be considered an independent is if the Republican Party were too liberal for his tastes.
Yeah, I get it. Anyone who's not a registered democrat or republican is technically an independent. That makes me "technically" an independent. But I'm sick to death of being bombarded be self-righteous idiots who claim being independent, yet speak ill of democrats and liberals at every turn, then claim they hated Bush. It's total BS, and I'm not going to listen to it.
And as far as what TonyR is saying...absolutely. I love the willingness of "independents" to distance themselves from Bush, yet claim that Obama has destroyed this country, and Romney is the one to turn it around. If you "hate" Bush, why are you voting for him (for a third time)?