Originally Posted by Jetmeck
lies.....................pure and simple..............you think for one minute anybody believes a union employee is easier to fire than a non union
employee ? Just happens to be one of the founding principles of unionization.............you can't just fire someone arbitrarily.
ass clown idiot
It is easier to fire a union employee because it is all down on paper what they can and can not do the rules are clear..
follow the rules and give them the warnings and then fire them if they do it again..
with non union employees the rules are not always on paper and more warnings are given in most cases more time spent rehabilitating them .. nothing is black and white like it is with a union contract..
I have seen management bend over backwards to Not fire a marginal employee that is no union in hopes that it will keep union reps from attempting to organize them..
Not saying I have ever done that but I have seen it in the past.. Personally I liked union employees as I had a great contract and the union rep was a wuss..
I have never fired some one arbitrarily always had the facts cold.. most of the time the morons that though being union was great and could not be touched were the easiest to fire..