Quote:
Originally Posted by barryr
 , butt hurt as they say apparently. When you have the uncontrolled impulse to constantly follow me around in threads just to post insults then I know you've lost. In an idiot liberals' mind, anything they don't like or agree with is "proven" to be wrong or a fraud. D'Souza dared to try to find out more about Obama while Obama supporters would rather deal with Romney's dog since they are afraid what would be found out about Obama. Obama has been president for almost 4 years and the liberal media still does little to find out about Obama and just takes his word when they rarely do that with anyone else, especially anyone that doesn't have a "d" by their name. |
Do you know what a "fact" is? I'll help:
Quote:
fact[fakt]
noun
1.
something that actually exists; reality; truth: Your fears have no basis in fact.
|
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/fact?s=t
D'Souza does not use "facts" in his presentation. He makes assertions about Obama's beliefs based on the history of a father whom he barely knew, and offers little of substance from Obama's own life to support that assertion. You see, when you make assertions that you can't support with facts, that's called "paranoia." That's called being a "conspiracy theorist."
Instead of your usual garbage, why don't you present a case using actual facts that proves D'Souza's assertions? You wouldn't know a fact if it slapped you in the face.
Come to think of it, this is the problem with right-wingers in general. They don't know the difference between an "assertion" and a "fact."